GPExGhana Policy ExchangeIdeas that move Ghana forward.← Main site

Editorial standard

Editorial independence

The safeguards that separate evidence and editorial judgement from political, financial and membership influence.

Last updated 12 August 2026

Our purpose

Ghana Policy Exchange supports evidence-led debate and practical policy development. We are non-partisan: we may assess governments, institutions and proposals, but we do not campaign for a political party or permit party-political advocacy to determine our conclusions.

Editorial authority

The Editor-in-Chief has final authority over what is published. Members, donors, partners, office-holders and contributors may propose issues or submit evidence, but they cannot purchase, direct or veto editorial conclusions. Sponsorship does not confer advance approval or favourable coverage.

Evidence and review

Material claims should be traceable to sources. Analysis must distinguish observed facts, projections, interpretation and recommendations. Significant briefings follow an approval-first workflow that may include evidence analysis, fact-checking, impact review and final editorial approval.

Fairness and conflicts

We seek relevant perspectives, describe important limitations and give people or institutions a reasonable opportunity to respond to serious claims about them. Authors and reviewers must disclose interests that could reasonably be perceived to affect their judgement.

Accountability

We correct material errors transparently. Concerns about independence or accuracy can be sent to info@ghanapolicyexchange.org.